Showing posts with label #foreclosurefraud. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #foreclosurefraud. Show all posts

Monday, May 14, 2012

S.E.C. Investigating JPMorgan's $2Billion Loss, Hope they Can Follow the Money.

S.E.C. Opens Investigation Into JPMorgan’s $2 Billion Loss

Regulators are investigating potential civil violations surrounding the $2 billion loss that JPMorgan Chase disclosed on Thursday, raising further questions about trading activities at the nation’s biggest bank.
The Securities and Exchange Commission recently opened a preliminary investigation into JPMorgan’s accounting practices and public disclosures about the trades, according to people briefed on the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the case is not public. Regulators learned about the activities in April, and formally opened an investigation in recent days, the people said.
The inquiry, which is being run out of New York, will probably examine the bank’s past regulatory filings about the internal unit that placed the trades, as well as recent statements from the firm’s top executives.
In April, questions surfaced about the group, called the chief investment office, after reports emerged that a London-based trader was taking large bets that distorted the market. At the time, Jamie Dimon, the bank’s chief executive, publicly dismissed the concerns about the trading activities, calling them a “complete tempest in a teapot.”
On Thursday, JPMorgan revealed that the group had suffered significant losses, which could cost the firm $2 billion or more. A more humble Mr. Dimon on Thursday said “egregious mistakes” were made.
An important avenue for the S.E.C. investigation, the people said, is the firm’s accounting methods relating to the trades. Investigators could take a close look at a measure known as value-at-risk. The company disclosed earlier this year that it changed the way it calculates the metric, which may have masked some of the risk surrounding this trade. On a conference call Thursday, Mr. Dimon said the firm had reverted to the old way of measuring value-at-risk.
The people cautioned that the investigation is at an early stage. No one at JPMorgan has been accused of any wrongdoing. JPMorgan was not immediately available for comment. A spokesman for the S.E.C. declined to comment.
The $2 billion trading loss comes as policy makers put the finishing touches on new industry regulations, including the so-called Volcker Rule that bans banks from making bets with their own money. Banks, including JPMorgan, have been pushing back on some of the rules, saying they will hurt the markets and the broader economy. But JPMorgan’s disclosure on Thursday could provide bank reformers with additional fodder.
“The enormous loss JPMorgan announced today is just the latest evidence that what banks call ‘hedges’ are often risky bets that so-called ‘too big to fail’ banks have no business making,” Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat, said in a statement on Thursday.
United States and British regulators have been taking a look at the JPMorgan unit for nearly a month, after media reports shined a spotlight on the trading group. The bank started talking with the Federal Reserve and Britain’s Financial Services Authority about the chief investment office in April, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter. The S.E.C. became aware of the group’s activities around the same time.
In the weeks that followed, regulators asked for more information about the unit’s activities. When the losses started to mount, JPMorgan informed regulators in the week prior to Thursday’s official announcement, one of the people said.
“It’s not surprising that we’ve been holding discussions about what has been going on,” said one person, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Mark Scott contributed reporting from London.

JPMorgan Chase How Is Your Right Arm Operating While Your Left Arm Is Stealing Homes? Enquiring Minds Want to Know. (Love You So Much)


May 13, 2012 6:21 PM

Top JPMorgan Chase exec to resign over loss

(CBS/AP) JPMorgan Chase is expected to accept the resignation of one of the highest-ranking women on Wall Street after the bank lost $2 billion in a trading blunder, a person familiar with the matter said Sunday.
The bank will accept the resignation of Ina Drew, its chief investment officer, the person told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to discuss the decision publicly.
Drew, 55, one of the highest-paid officials at JPMorgan Chase, had offered to resign several times since CEO Jamie Dimon disclosed the trading loss on Thursday, the person said. Pressure built on the bank over the weekend to accept.
At least two other executives at the bank will be held accountable for the mistake, the person said.
Earlier in the day, CEO Jamie Dimon called the trades "a terrible, egregious mistake." He also acknowledged the Security and Exchange Commission is investigating whether rules were broken.
"We know we were sloppy. We know we were stupid. We know there was bad judgment. We don't know if any of that is true yet. And of course regulators should look at something like this. That's their job so we are totally open to regulators and they will come to their own conclusions," Dimon said. "We took far too much risk, the strategy that we had was barely vetted, it was badly monitored. It should never have happened."
Michael Greenberger, a former Wall Street regulator and current law professor, said it should come as little surprise that smart, savvy bankers like Dimon made mistakes like this.
"These kinds of transactions are as complex as they are risky. And it's very difficult for anybody really to understand what's going on. I think (in) the end (it will be) shown the trader himself didn't understand what was going on," Greenberger said.
Warren: JPMorgan CEO should resign from NY Fed
Watch: JPMorgan Chase CEO admits mistakes
JPMorgan Chase: London whale swallows $2B Part of the problem is not just understanding these trades.
"These traders are given enormous discretion without proper supervision or Understanding, and you end up with these enormous losses," Greeneberger said.
The sweeping financial reform bill that was passed in the wake of the last financial crisis - the Dodd-Frank bill - would have had safe guards in place to prevent these trades, had they been implemented, Greenberger said.

"This kind of trade would have been banned" under a fully-implemented Dodd-Frank, Greenberger said. "JP Morgan Chase has been arguing that these kinds of trades should go forward. But (some of the rules) on Dodd-Frank, the way they were written, these kinds of risky, complex trades would be banned."
What's scary about the situation is how likely it is to happen again.
"Of course it could happen at another bank next week," Greenberger said. "JP Morgan Chase and Jamie Dimon are the brightest guys in the room. If they have this problem, god knows how many other people have these problems. And this could lead us right back to where we were in 2008.